Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: What to do in a bear encounter #55933
:D:lol: It’s one of the silliest things I have ever seen. I love that at some point several people must have looked at this and said “Oh yeah, that’s really good, we’ll put that on tv”. :lol::lol::lol::lol:
Oh well, her wildly clueless attempt at public education is so funny Jay Leno has given her a call. I try to be funny and he’s never called me. Jerk.
colmike wrote: forget all that stuff about ankle support.
My experience with all this, limited though it is, is a bit different. I have a dodgy right ankle from a pretty rough ligament tear, several years old. It means when I lift my knee up, instead of hanging in a generally well aligned fashion like my left, my right foot hangs with the outside very low.
It’s not hard to imagine that causes problems stomping around rocky features in the middle of the night with heavy loads on my back. It’s an ankle that wants to roll at the best of times. So for me the value of a boot isn’t support, in any sense of it strengthening the joint, it’s value is in alignment. It keeps that wonky foot aligned so the natural ‘strength’ of the joint (as mike rightly points out) can do the work.
Obviously my case is extreme because of my goofy stump, but the aid in alignment is applicable to smaller degrees with other factors, like fatigue, steep inclines, rough terrain. Put weight on your back and all your tolerances narrow even further and the amount of damage done by a roll is enhanced.
All that being said I’ve met aborigines who’ve never worn a pair of shoes, I have a friend who runs several marathons a year barefoot. But they have the most hideous, gnarly feet I’ve ever seen 😉
Preston,
Have a look at Nike’s SFB and Rocky C4’s. They’re just like wearing a pair of runners. The rocky’s are 120 bucks tyd from uspatriot. Danner reckons their Jackals are light at 42oz (I don’t know if that’s one or the pair), the Nike’s are 16oz/boot.
If you’re going to carry a heavy load any kind of distance, these two are no good.
in reply to: I have declared war on the squirrels! #54791R2 wrote: I actually caught two in my (shhh)cat trap
:D:lol::lol:
I haven’t laughed out loud like that from something I’ve read in a while Ralph. 😀 I want a cat trap now just so I can say ‘sshh’ when I talk about it! 😆
in reply to: Heat gun glue for arrows? #54045I use a drop of Arrowmate for my knocks. I’ve not had one pop off, but it’s weak enough I can pull the nock off with a pair of pliers without damaging the shaft.
in reply to: REAL primitive bowhunting! #53979Preston, that’s awesome mate! Thanks for sharing it 😀
Jim
in reply to: Bulbed locater grip #53627Cyrille,
I had a look on their website and they had some pics in their custom bow design section that may help.
This was described as a ‘pistol’ or ‘locator’ grip:
Compared to a standard or straight grip:
When you said ‘bulbed’ I pictured something more like this, which I guess is just a more pronounced ‘pistol’ style:
in reply to: Ancient crafts #53605Tailfeather, I had to look Derby up 😀 I’ve never been anywhere near the north coast of WA, but I think it is seriously remote! The end of the nomads was a lot more central I think, about a thousand km’s south of Derby, but I’d have to look up the book to be sure. I know WA like the back of a strangers hand 😳
Steve, I read elsewhere that the Wira is also called a Cooloomon, which translates literally to ‘vessel’. Perhaps there was a little lost in translation when the narrator said it is used for digging. The only references I can find to them are as a bowl or plate for carrying/serving food.
in reply to: Low Poundage FOC #52945Well, I shot it at twenty metres and didn’t really see where it landed so went out to the target to have a look. When I got there I heard a thunk and there it was! Talk about slow…
Another remarkable feature was that it was point on target at 20m (it is a long shaft, the point is a lot further out there). So well and truly on the way down by 20m.
I guess the little bow was a little worn out by the weight of it all. I’d still be keen to see what could be achieved with a softer, low gpi shaft and something more like a 250 or 300gn head. Alas, its back to the longbow and some stiffer shafts 😀
in reply to: Low Poundage FOC #52506Yeah Dave, my backyard range is only 10m. I’ll let you know how it goes.
in reply to: REAL primitive bowhunting! #51676David Petersen wrote:
What I found interesting is the Bushmen’s “bowhunting style,” which seems to involve launching dozens of arrows from great distances. I wonder if that tells us anything about how the first bowhunters operated.
In seriousness though, it strikes me as a distinctly ‘open country’ method, where a close stalk would be very challenging/impossible and small, weak bows aren’t going to offer a mortal wound to big game even then. It’s probably safe to assume the first bows were weak, but where they were first used, and to hunt what kind of animals, strike me as harder questions to answer.
in reply to: REAL primitive bowhunting! #51427David Petersen wrote:
What I found interesting is the Bushmen’s “bowhunting style,” which seems to involve launching dozens of arrows from great distances. I wonder if that tells us anything about how the first bowhunters operated.
It tells us they weren’t paying 100 bucks per dozen shafts. Probably used aluminium the cheapskates.
Plato wrote: Wise men speak because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something.
No one asked you Plato. Bully.
in reply to: REAL primitive bowhunting! #50538David Petersen wrote: I’m in love!
Me too Dave, did you see that little guy throw the (what ever the heck that was) over his shoulders? That would be like me fireman carrying a scrub bull. He’s dreamy 😉
Also, screw the gillie, next time I hunt it will be in a G-string!
in reply to: Dipping fail #50521Goraidh wrote: Jim, Did you just fess up to being the Village Idiot of whom you originally wrote?
😳
in reply to: Dipping fail #50320Fella’s, thanks for all the tips. I tried a recoat of lacquer but it had been days since they messy one was applied and didn’t work. So I’ll give sanding a go. If that’s too time consuming I may get some chemical assistance.
Mike, I’m glad my constant stream of failures lights up your day 😉
garydavis wrote: I know it’s not as much fun,but sometimes it’s OK to read the instructions on the can.
Gary, that is the single most ridiculous suggestion I have ever read on the internet. But seriously, cheers for the detailed response 😉
-
AuthorPosts