[Charles Ek]

in reply to: Can You, or Cant You? #31739

Every time I try to hew to the rigid dictates of the morally upright, I can’t think of a reason to follow their example in this regard. I do hope that unlike so many other topics in modern society, this one does not devolve into cant. 😉

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: GPS in trad bow. #28481

SteveMcD wrote: Well. I will respectfully disagree. I see the GPS as a further cave in to technology. Last I checked most maps, State, USGS or other, clearly without any doubt illustrate between private and public land. It’s about being prepared, maybe even scouting beforehand, imagine that. I guess if someone trespasses now, they can just blame technology for it. Nope. Not buying it. Literally. I will stick with my map and compass.

We’re not talking about distinguishing between public and private land per se. A great deal of hunting in New England is done on private land because there’s relatively little public land available. The issue is which private parcels can be hunted on.

In NH for instance, the presumption is that all private land is huntable unless it is posted (or otherwise subject to certain restrictions on the use of weapons.) This state has a greater portion of its land cover in forest than any other state in the Union. Unless you start at a surveyor’s stake and follow a compass bearing very precisely using the parcel’s legal description, there’s often NO way to know where the parcel boundaries are without a GPS that has the data in it. The posting is often done only along roads and I know of many instances in which a boundary not along a road is not posted. Knowing where it is keeps me out of trouble, and helps all hunters.

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: GPS in trad bow. #21761

skinner biscuit wrote: This post was never intended to condone trespassing.Rather that as a non trespassing tool,the GPS is finally accepted in the trad bow community.

Which is EXACTLY the point of Don Thomas’s note and why I support the use of GPS devices for this purpose. It’s one thing to know which drainage you’re crossing, it’s a whole different thing knowing where an unmarked parcel boundary is located in the middle of thick woods.

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: Untamed – Online now #20662

And just how am I supposed to maintain my practice shooting and scouting (never mind working for a living) when this is available? 😉

I waited and waited over here in NH for the tour to make it this far, to no avail. Thanks so much for making it available, and you can bet I’ll be sharing it!

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: Strange Things/Near Misses #20111

I have learned the hard way never to trust old plastic nocks on “vintage” arrows. I melt them off first if I want to use the shaft.

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: Hammock Seat Hedonism, Episode 1 #54123

It’s the Dead Ringer Hammock Seat.

Your price may vary, depending on your diligence in searching for a deal. 😉

Disclosure: I wasn’t nearly smart enough to find this thing on my own. A thread here on the Campfire Forum alerted me to it.

BTW, I use it with the camo side facing up under me. I find it more comfortable and quieter to sit on that side than on the black side.

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: outdoors/backwoodsman Class #45971

Hey Doug, have you seen this?

Explore Bowhunting curriculum from the ATA.

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: CAMO OR NOT who is the fool ? #45934

paleoman wrote: Ralph – you are absolutely correct. I was thinking more of the earlier seasons, like early fall in Alabama or something…seems that’d be warm. But then, I read somewhere that the wool Civil War uniforms were oddly not as bad as you’d think in the heat. Could that be true?

My late father-in-law wore woolen longjohns to work as a railroad carman year-round in MN, which approaches the South for heat and humidity in the middle of summer. Wool in its various versions is the most comfortable clothing to wear most of the time, in my experience.

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: Killing the future of hunting. #40345

Warning: Brag ahead

[brag]

Bagged a big one in the past week. A guy I know who has shot a compound for the last several years, with an enormous circle of hunting acquaintances and very considerable influence on policy matters, came over a few days ago to shoot my bows and mull the idea of going trad. I handed him a rubber ball first and told him to hit my hanging stall mat. From there he progressed through my selfbow, Kodiak De Luxe, Kodiak Magnum, Morrison Dakota and Paxton Talon Swift, all without the “benefit” of anything smaller than the mat to shoot at. We discussed the importance of not overbowing himself. I was nudging him toward the mid and upper 40s.

Early this morning he sent photos from shooting his new-to-him ’70s Kodiak Magnum, 48#. We found it yesterday at a very reasonable price and excellent condition. When he held the grip for the first time and flung some arrows in the retailer’s testing booth, his smile told me the bow was sold.

[/brag]

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: 2015 mast and fruit crop outlook #37492

Add hazelnuts to the list – best year for production I’ve seen here in 14 years.

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: But Whose Counting? #37484

I’m counting: 64 days. Thick leaf cover and sunglasses are enough to simulate twilight conditions here in the latter part of the day. And I mostly don’t even have to worry about the vampires … aka deer flies.

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: Boots #33151

Unless you’re frequently in very wet ground, I’d take a look at Limmer Boot Company‘s Light-Weight boots. Yes, you can buy boots by mail and have them fit.

I have a pair of their Standards that I wore for years as a SAR dog handler. My only regret is that I’ll never get a chance to wear them out. My wife has the Light-Weights and the Ultra-Lights. The Light-Weight is actually a robust boot – in other manufacturer’s lines, it would be a backpacking boot of some consequence. Here are some other reviews:

Trailspace reviews

Mail order experience and review and their care and feeding. The author writes, “I will argue that a well treated full leather boot is more waterproof and breathable than any synthetic membrane boot.”

And he will get no argument from me – that has been our experience with Limmer boots as well.

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: Killing the future of hunting. #31401

I am frequently quite discouraged at the direction things are headed with regard to humans’ understanding of our place IN the natural world, not above it or simply alongside it. I found some encouragement yesterday, however, when a compound-shooting friend came over to shoot my trad bows. He had a lot of fun and a convert was made. Now, his own dissatsfaction with the direction of bowhunting (and hunting in general) had a lot to do with his coming over; I just added some kindling to the tinder that was already lit.

I believe the cure for what ails bowhunting lies in two approaches, both of which I’m going to do something about:

1. Introducing adult acquaintances to the unique pleasures of shooting trad bows. If a hunter commits to using this tackle, a change in mindset and relationship to the natural world is almost inevitable, IMO.

2. Find a way to do the same with kids. Bend that twig at an early age.

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: What is it's proper name? #30692

Some others:

Shaving Mule

Shaving Horse Plans

The Shaving Horse

[Charles Ek]

in reply to: Greetings and Hello #27210

Welcome! We used to live on the wet side of the Evergreen State (sic), and we’re hoping to move back in a couple of years.

You may be aware that WA has a long bowhunting tradition. One of the people who played a minor role 😉 is profiled in this chapter from The Traditional Bowhunter’s Handbook (a book I strongly recommend you consider buying):

Glenn St. Charles

[Author]

Posts