[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: "What you talking about Willis" #37546

Ok, I have my decoder ring ready.

Can’t let this info get in the wrong hands

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: "What you talking about Willis" #37537

I don’t remember sending you an email, geees, I just wanted a place to start building my ******** well you know.8) lol

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: "What you talking about Willis" #37508

Speaking for Willis for a moment…….:D

You will also find 4 different spines on the same shaft, say what 😯 yes, north, south, east & west will have different spines, not all the time, but some times, so, some times you can turn the shaft and get a different spine, allowing you to match them up, just mark which side you want against the riser.

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: A long look at fletching and EFOC #37440

Troy Breeding wrote: Just wait until they see my turbo booster I’m designing.:shock:

Troy

That gave me an Idea…. what if we fill the shaft with gun powder and use a CB cap to detonate.

Oh… we might have to hunt in the black powder season.

Never mind

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: A long look at fletching and EFOC #37434

I only thought WE where NUTS……. Now I KNOW 🙄

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: A long look at fletching and EFOC #37428

Just one question? where did you get the enriched uranium 😯

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: A long look at fletching and EFOC #37425

Troy got it…. nice detail

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: A long look at fletching and EFOC #37417

I have been working with my compass to try and figure out how Troy did it………

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: A long look at fletching and EFOC #37402

To little never works…….:(

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: A long look at fletching and EFOC #37392

Dr. Ed Ashby wrote: Is duct tape considered traditional?

Ed

40 years ago……. that’s Fred Bear’s traditional time frame.

On the lunar surface in December 1972, Apollo 17 astronauts Harrison Schmitt and Eugene Cernan needed to repair one of their lunar rover’s fenders in an effort to keep the “rooster tails” of dust away from themselves and their gear. This picture reveals the wheel and fender of their dust covered rover along with the ingenious application of spare maps, clamps, and grey strip of “duct tape”.

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: A long look at fletching and EFOC #37385

Troy, I need all your specs on your arrow, including all parts used.

Thanks bro.

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: Fronkinsteen flies, she flies!!!! #37374

WOW!!!!!! Troy, that is awesome. 😀

I might of missed it but refresh my memory ( I’m working on vary little ram ) lol,

Specks please:

Bow

Draw weight & length

Arrow type and specks

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: A long look at fletching and EFOC #33884

Troy,

Your still almost half the point weight I need to get to 43%

I sure hope you can get there, I would be willing to go 1200-1400 grains. 😯

I just got some new Morrison carbon foam 67lb’er I think would love to shoot them.

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: A long look at fletching and EFOC #33867

Dr. Ed Ashby wrote: We must keep this site secret while working on the BHFOC. I see the relatively benign EFOC and small fletching thread got pulled from another site. No telling what they might do if they heard of the heresy underway here. 😈

Ed

I gotcha Doc. we will speak in code from now on…. we need a secret name for this.

How bout “Manhattan project”

[kingwouldbe]

in reply to: A long look at fletching and EFOC #33862

What chu talking about Willis……………hold on there….. your 860 grains less that what I came up with, that just might be workable.

What we need is someone to turn some 400, 500, 600, 700 grain broadhead inserts, then at least we can start to shoot it, to see if we can tune it.

Troy,

It looks like your stacking inserts on field points, it that right?

I did internal and external footing to see if it would spine, but I don’t have anything heavy enough to shoot.

With a heavy 500 grain broadhead adapter and a 300 grain broadhead, now we’re talking.

Troy,

I think your going to have to do some internal footing to get that shaft to handle that much weight hanging on the front, and that is why the overall weight go’s up, it takes away from the foc or the BHFOC……. lol

Oh! we have the first pic’s of the BHFOC in flight

[Author]

Posts