Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Wolves relisted #30817
Folks who are going to comment on this might do well to read the court’s decision first, whatever your perspective:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES v. JEWELL
Want to know how to tell when a federal judge is pissed? Here’s a clue:
“The D.C. Circuit has noted that, at times, a court ‘must lean forward from the bench to let an agency know, in no uncertain terms, that enough is enough.’ Pub. Citizen Health Res. Grp. v. Brock, 823 F.2d 626, 627 (D.C. Cir. 1987). This case is one of those times. The FWS’s Final Rule challenged in this action is no more valid than the agency’s three prior attempts to remove federal protections for a population of gray wolves, which are otherwise members of an endangered species. The challenged Final Rule is predicated on both an untenable reading of the ESA and otherwise flawed findings. For the reasons more fully detailed below, the plaintiffs’ motion is granted and the defendants and defendant-intervenor’s motions are denied.”
in reply to: Suggestions: History of Archery Books #23846“Longbow: A Social and Military History” by Robert Hardy (proving that you can’t judge an actor by his stage, TV and film resume):
“This revised and expanded edition chronicles the history of the longbow from the earliest known example used 8000 years ago, through its coming of age at the battles of Crecy, Poitiers and Agincourt, to its use as a hunting and sporting weapon, and its present-day status in Britain. The book contains the first authoritative account of the archery equipment found in Henry VIII’s warship the Mary Rose; describes the archers themselves, their equipment, training, uniform and terms of service; examines the fact and fiction of the Robin Hood legend, the reasons why the French never took to the weapon and the devastating effect of longbow against longbow in the Wars of the Roses; offers a detailed account of how to make a longbow from scratch, including all the tools and materials required. By the author of “The Great War Bow”.”
“The Great Warbow: From Hastings to the Mary Rose“
by Matthew Strickland and Robert Hardy
in reply to: Hope you ENJOY #23841Fabulous! Thanks for sharing this day brightener.
in reply to: Can I get a recommendation? #18738Seems to be a bad echo in here … 😉
in reply to: Can I get a recommendation? #18736If it has been marketed for wearing next to your skin in the winter, I’ve probably worn it at some point.
Started with Duofold cotton as a kid. Then came the new miracle fabrics, the first of which was polypropylene from Lifa. It wicked very nicely and stank to you-know-what. Later came Capilene in various weights (and variously successful imitations) which I wore in Washington, Alaska, Minnesota and New England as a Nordic skier, snowshoer, winter camper and SAR dog handler. Then what was old became new again – SmartWool arrived on the scene, followed by a host of me-toos. Most recently came the embedded silver threads meant to encourage friends, family and acquaintances to stay in the same room when you entered after a day in the field.
I’ve finally settled on what my father-in-law wore next to his skin nearly year-round while working as a railroad carman: Wool. I buy it in various weights as needed for my exertion level and the conditions. It keeps me warm, it doesn’t stink and it is sustainable.
[/recommending]
in reply to: Longbow shot while sitting #12589As much as I enjoy shooting my 66-inch selfbows (including from a Hammock Seat), you’d be hard-pressed to find two trees that far apart here in New Hampshire.
The rack here includes a 52-inch K-Mag, 56-inch Grizzly, 58-inch Morrison Dakota, two 60-inch Kodiaks, one 60-inch Super Kodiak, and two 66-inch selfbows. (Yeah, I have a problem, and no, I’m NOT working on it. 😆 )
in reply to: Turn for the better #51659Good on ya! Congratulations.
in reply to: The Hammock Seat #49792Patrick wrote: Even works in a corn field…right?
Absolutely. Just as long as you’re a Wallenda.
in reply to: Greetings/Introduction #44750For answers to questions you haven’t thought of yet (and more), may I suggest getting a copy of The Traditional Bowhunter’s Handbook, written by a guy who happens to be your host here. (I don’t get any benefit from such a recommendation other than a warm glow from helping another bowhunter. 😉 )
in reply to: Cold Weather Gloves #43290Smithhammer wrote: I recently got these gloves from John Turner at American Leathers. They come with full fingers on both hands, and you can trim them to accomodate your glove, as needed. The seams are intentionally sewn so that they won’t unravel when you cut the fingers off.
Thanks for the tip! My niece is supposed to be working on custom shooting mitts for me, but if the much-maligned, equally misunderstood polar vortex actually gets here before she’s done I may have to grab a pair of these.
in reply to: Traditional Snowshoes for Hunting #41334grumpy wrote: Have used both (but we called them bear paw, not Green Mt. here in New England)
This will come as news to some folks in that verdant state to your north, who came up with the design – and the name. 😉
1979 Sports Illustrated article:
AT VERMONT TUBBS THEY STILL MAKE SNOWSHOES THE WAY THEY USED TO
in reply to: From Spain #39658¡Bienvenidos a la hoguera de campamento!
Your article is fantastic. We need to see many more like that.
in reply to: Traditional Snowshoes for Hunting #38880I started with snowshoes when neoprene was something only divers knew about. I would be all over that Rabbit Hunter if I didn’t already have four pairs of ‘shoes in the house. The Green Mountain would have been my first recommendation of all types available until I saw the former – the style has had a well-deserved reputation for versatility for a long time and used to be made by many makers.
I suppose I should explain that I’m thinking here specifically of hunting for game that likes heavy cover. I’d have a different recommendation for ptarmigan and other open country applications with very deep snow and long treks.
in reply to: Totally Traditional #38637Here’s a paradoxical philosophy (hey, I’m a Homo sapiens – I’m entitled by birthright …)
Like the guy just to the east of me, I hunt in some pretty thick woods here in NH. Seeing deer on the all-too rare occasions is a kick; shooting a deer is pretty darn tough with a bow in these circumstances.
So I hunt with traditional tackle for three months of the year and three weeks in the middle with a rifle. I’ve even been known to carry a weatherproof shotgun during truly nasty sweather, just to avoid the rifle maintenance when I’m don’t have time for it.
When I carry the bow, I’m a bowhunter. That’s my frame of mind. I’m fortunate to be able to shoot a variety of hunting situations behind my house virtually daily, and I have thousands of acres within ten minutes for stumping. So I don’t feel like carrying a rifle for three weeks (if it takes that long) gets much in the way of “getting my mind right” for bowhunting.
However, if I were a sort-of-former compound shooter struggling slightly with doubts of whether to commit fully to stick and string, I’d sell the wheels. I would want to have my mind in the trad game when presented with an animal. The shooting that goes on between our ears is crucial to success, and doubts about our abilities are inimical to success.
-
AuthorPosts
