There’s no question that the reaction from the Way Overboard has been extreme. I don’t agree with a lot that has be said, about killing animals is wrong and all that. But this case shows you how important it is to be outspoken about what happens within our ranks. “Our ranks” here include traditional archery, but our ranks as viewed by the world in its entirety include all sorts and mixed of personal views and ethical standards.
Trophy hunting might have its place in the world, as it adds to the economy and those who have a reason to protect their wildlife will protect it, even if it’s for a buck.
However, I have to say killing and trashing the meat is wrong. I have to say that luring an animal out of its protected area to kill it for profit is wrong. A lot of meat from trophy hunts have gone to feed the hungry and that should be the case if it isn’t eaten by the hunter.
It is also true that a hunter should be able to trust his guide or PH to know where he is and that the legal licenses have been purchased. Whether there was a wink and a nod in this case may never be known. Whether the hunter was in on it or it was just the guide, we may never know, but someone is responsible. That hunter was responsible when he lied to the feds about a bear. That guy paid is way clear of a sexual harassment case, too.
I don’t think the fellow should hang on this case based on his history, but we as observers have a right to form some opinions based on all of that, even though those same things might not be admissible in court. The public has a right to know things that a juror does not. That’s the law.
I think it’s important for us to discuss this and have our opinions to air out. We should obviously hold ourselves to the same standards as we hold others, too.
I appreciate this discussion. I hope I’m being clear on my ideas. Thank you, dwc
