Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Tip of the week #13850
Wellsir, speaking of “truth in advertising,” who is that young skinny guy with the dead prongyin “your” avatar photo? 😯 Surely not the same old F— who thinks he can still lift a 4,000-pound trailer and turn it around, and is surprised when something inside goes “Crunch! Ouch! Sh–!” :o:shock: Eh?
in reply to: Hunting Public land #12654To return to Brokentoe’s initial question about good places … my affection for quality, unroaded, unspoiled, uncrowded, truly wild public backcountry land is so intense, and so many hunters today treat it like a garbage can and motorized destruction-derby park, that I no longer tell anyone I don’t know any good places until I determine they don’t use an ATV and have a strong respect for the prey, the land and how hunters must conduct ourselves in order for hunting to deserve, in the public eye, to survive. I have always been flabbergasted that a majority of hunters instantl hit the panic button when someone yells “The antis are coming!, or when NRA screams “The liberals are after your guns!” yet absolutely don’t give a flying hoot that our public lands happy hunting grounds are literally losing ground daily to stupid rushed energy development, logging practices that were proven ecologically destructive decades ago, and a thundering assult my motorized abuse. To have good hunting, we need animals to hunt and places to hunt them. To have wild animals in both quantity and quality, they need habitat. Their habitat is our habitat. Let’s not just use it. Let’s fight to keep it. I tried to avoid the bait of this thread and not go off on a rant, but there it is. As a whole, hunters’ priorities are all screwed up. Dave
in reply to: Hunting Public land #11562Steve — In that case I may have to come visit this fall! 😆
in reply to: Tip of the week #10629Yes but Larry, you’re not an old dog! You’re an old bull moose! A survivor of Teddy’s party. 😛
in reply to: Layers Everywhere #9012BC — I believe it’s Bowyer’s Bible V2 that talks about lam bows. Someone here please correct me if I’m wrong. Point is, B B pretty much covers everything about everything, in one volume or another. Should be fun. dave
in reply to: Turkeys Soon! #63548Ed Z — it appears you and I have the same “house hubby” fate! Could be a LOT worse! And in fact it has been. 😯 But hey, when they let you disrupt life for a month at a time to indulge our hunting jones — getting up early, coming in late, triple the normal laundry, etc. — well, what’s a few dirty dishes? Happy camper here! 😀 dave
in reply to: Wood arrows and EFOC #63265Kegan — In sum, your choices are WoodyWeights, internal tungsten footing (no other material — steel, copper, lead — is both heavy and strong enough), just gluing on a heavy head (best with footed shafts), or using an external footing in the form of 3″ or so of aluminum shafting glued onto the the wood shaft end. I have tested them all, and all have disadvantages. The cheapest and easiest route to good FoC with woodies is to use a light wood shaft, single tapered, and the heaviest good broadhead you can find (and they’re getting heavier all the time. With perpendicular shots you’re likely OK, but with angled bone impacts there’s a high risk of the shaft breaking right behind the head. The internal tungsten footing added to this will get you into the 20%+ FoC range with less risk of the head breaking, but is expensive and a lot of work. In my backyard tests, shooting at angles into trees, the Woody Weights tended to “break” where glued to the point, and also increased shaft breakage behind the head due not only to the extra head weight but also, I presume, to the longer lever-arm they create. The only “solution” I’ve found so far that I’d hunt elk with is the external footing or “sock.” This has the added advantage of allowing/forcing you to use screw-in heads, which, with glue-in inserts allow a lot more possibilities for EFoC. To date I’ve not been able to get one to break behind the sock. Only drawback here is that right now, so far as I know, you can only get aluminum shaft inserts for aluminum shafts, which Ashby’s testing has shown to be a real weak point … and also such a rig looks rather clunky though it shoots fine. And so it remains for now that if our goal is max FoC, carbon shafts are the way to go — maybe wood-grained carbons? 😛 But keep in mind that most bowhunters, who never hunt anything bigger than whitetails and maybe feral pigs, don’t really need 25+% FoC to get the job done. Although Ashby’s research shows that EFoC adds more to penetration than overall arrow weight, a good heavy wood arrow with the right head will still get the job done on most game. Right now I’m shooting carbons for elk because I want the insurance. I shoot woodies for everything else. I have no doubt that someday soon, some intrepid arrow maker will solve this problem for us. In nature, no rich habitat goes unoccupied for long!
in reply to: Turkeys Soon! #63249Indeed, my wife says I’ve started gobbling in my sleep already!:lol:
For rent CHEAP: December through April, tiny SUMMER cabin at 8000′ in the lovely Colorado Rockies! Cut your own 6 cords of firewood to see you through. Bring many snowshovels and candles. Often can’t get out — and far more often can’t get back in — for days at a time. Electricity doesn’t go out as often or for so long as it used to … but bring plenty of candles anyhow. Inquire at: “RUserious.com” :twisted::evil::roll::shock:
in reply to: Who Shoots Hickory? #61521Sir Steve — I think we had a thread on this recently, but of course I have no memory (a blessing in many ways) and rely on Robin for brain cells. I can say that the first clean pass-through shots I ever experienced on elk, and the first two elk (after killing at least a dozen before that with stickbow) I watched die within a few yards, were with the same hick shaft (recovered and used again) at 743 grains as I recall (2-blade head). These were very skinny shafts, not easy to warp but not easy to straighten. I may still have a couple. But since then I’ve proven to myself that a lighter shaft, 650 or slightly more, with EFoC gets even better penetration without the total weight, thus a bit flatter and faster, etc. So while I once praised hick shafts, in my own little bowhunting world I’ve gone beyond that, seeking 650 or so overall with as little of that as possible in the wood and as much as possible in the broadhead. But then, keep in mind that my whole world is designed around killing elk, and what works for me in that world may not be the best bet for others hunting deer, pigs, etc. But I think it’s safe to suggest that for most purposes hickory is more weight than it pays its own way for. dave
in reply to: Let's build a selfbow #61313Good show, Clay. Thanks for the considerable effort. Don’t think I’d have the nerve to take my first shots with a new bow on video, since that’s when about half of mine blow up! Good luck on the moose draw. dave
in reply to: longbow press? #61305Carl — you might try contacting Bingham’s if nobody here can help. Good luck. d
cfiles — great, and tough, question. When I first started experimenting with carbons I tried hot-melt and even though I used care not to overheat the shaft, I ruined a couple before going to 2-tube epoxy, which of course is mega-permanent. This is a new one on me. What about the rest of you guys looking in on this? For starters I’d contact the supplier, which I’m guessing is ABS, and put the question to them. I hope to learn something here. Thanks for asking. 🙄
in reply to: Favorite wild game recipe #57944Hey this is cool! 8) I’ll be printing these off for my wife … and sharing her’s with you. You know, as a couple, no kids, we can eat on a single elk almost every night for almost a year, and in a growing number of whitetail states with no or large limits, it is entirely possible to be a wild-meat carnivore exclusively (at least at home). So we can never ever have enough great recipes, and the easier the better (I mean, some among us are bachelors!). Good thread. Thanks, dave
in reply to: subscription #57940J — yes indeed I am. But May could be too early, esp. this year with massive snowpack. I would come as late as possible prior to school-out: late May/early June. There’s one big jump in tourism in early June, and a much bigger bump starting July 4. If you’re moteling, no big deal. If you’re camping, you can expect snow in the high country in early May. Hard to beat the stretch from Montrose down to Durango for scenery, ups and down and curves … with fantastic fishing and hunting everywhere you can see. Then to Pagosa Springs, Chama and Taos for more of the same. Ride safe, dave
-
AuthorPosts
