Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: reflex/deflex #48522
T-Roy … I seem to recall providing this answer before, and if it didn’t satisfy then it won’t now. But the simplest way to view it is that the deflex-reflex limb design provides all the same advantages of a recurve but spreads the design through the full limbs rather than just at the tips. Advantages are the same: more speed, less or no hand shock, a shorter bow that’s forgiving, quietness … plus there’s no string slap which can sometimes be a problem with recurves.
I’m sure there are several others here who can explain in more detail, but the above points are the result. In sum, and taking a bit of leeway, I see modern r-d short “longbows” as offering the same advantages as recurves, so it comes down to personal preference in looks, feel, etc. I see no great advantages of either over the other, whereas the diff between a straight or Hill style longbow and a recurve are … well, documented in the tremendous popularity of recurves across recent decades. I shoot a 54″ r/d longbow and no longer even own a recurve. Just my pref.
in reply to: FASHION SHOW #47817Ah, Alex, you were doing “selfies” years before the term was invented! Clearly, you had a professional photographer with the elk photo! Cool hat. 😀
in reply to: FASHION SHOW #47776Mike– Love your Bukowski quote!
in reply to: MA-2 heads #47684Tom, an interesting thread. I’ve been doing this since ten years before Adam and Eve and never even knew of a two-blade MA, but only the clunky old MA3, sibling to the Bodkin. There are a few eccentric 😛 folks here who still swear by those soft old heads, but I am not among them. I presume you are doing this for nostalgia’s sake, like a step forward from using stone points. 😆 In sum, the steel they used was so amazingly soft I wouldn’t try using it to hunt anything bigger than a turkey. But then, there are zillions of hi-techies who could say the same for all of traditional archery. So while I can offer no help–other than I too a sold on single-bevels–I do wish you luck and hope to see your success photos here this fall.
Reminds me of that old saying “What was old, is new.” Or something like that.
in reply to: FASHION SHOW #47679Indeed, Jim! They were likely a couple! Is this the official uniform for the Ozzie airborne? 😛 Might get a bit chilly before hitting the ground.
I keep waiting for Hammer to wade in here and out-rageous us both. 😆
in reply to: FASHION SHOW #46602I hear the next big thing in high-fashion macho camo, sure to show up soon at Cabela’s and other hunting fashion purveyors, is the off-shoulder “Find your inner Divine” jungle look. You don’t have to shoot any animals as they all die laughing.
in reply to: To sleep, perchance to … sleep? #43954Back on topic … I ordered two Therma-Rest Ridgecrest SOLite sleeping pads for a total $59.90 from Zappos, with free shipping. They are 20″ wide by 72″ long and 1.5″ thick. With that thickness they should be dandy, and the rate higher in several categories than more expensive pads. Three sizes: small $20, regular (what I got) @30, and large $40. I’ll let you know if they suck or not. Thanks again for all the good leads.
in reply to: Spring fever #43838Steve — the grip looks a lot better from the other side! Especially from a distance … 😆
in reply to: a new chapter #43834Welcome, Stick! 😀
in reply to: To sleep, perchance to … sleep? #43138Seriously, Mike, you and all the other “dumb grunts” (to use your own jokingly self-effacing term) who did dodge bullets and sleep in the cold mud are the ones deserving of respect. I had it shamefully easy by comparison. Knowing you, I know I’d have been honored to serve with you, which alas is more than I can say for some CO’s I had. You done good hard work for a very long time and maintained humility and humanity through it all, and it’s an honor to be your friend. Of course, if you shot wheels or an x-gun … but then, for some, that’s just not possible.
“Corpsman up!” Now, you wanna talk about some seriously brave crazy heroic guys who saved lives!!! Without them, there would be nothing to load onto a dust-off but zipped-up body bags.
But, ooh, sorry Mom, we won’t do it again (fingers crossed under the table).
in reply to: To sleep, perchance to … sleep? #43095Very well then! While I really appreciate all of your good input, Eidsvolling and Steve G. seem to know my needs (and cheapskate personality) best. Steve reminded me–very important!–of the folly of making house guests overly comfy. (In all our years here, not a single in-law, all of whom are womens, has spent a single night in the Doghouse and I wouldn’t want to spoil that record. :twisted:). Happily, the first of the two comparison websites linked by Eids, above, has a graph that offers price/value comparisons at a glance. I think I’m going with the Therma-Rest insolite Ridgecrest SOLite full-length el cheapo for a paltry $20 each. (Seriously, I am not “cheap” by nature, but live mostly on Social Security and give as much of that as possible away, mostly to to the local brew pubs, so I must be parsemonious with my luxury purchases.) I still have my Paleolithic-era Ultra-lite knee-length inflatables, and with the foam pads beneath those, it should do the trick both for my camping uses and any cot-sleeping guests. As we said in the Marines, “f@#% ’em if they can’t take a joke!” Thanks again, Dave
PS to ColMike … well, yes, you have a point. But I did go through all the infantry training they could throw me into, about a year’s worth in all, and several survival schools. Seems I do recall a few less-than-comfy nights “sleeping” on the snow with only a leaky tarp beneath my worn-out Korean-era prickly feather bag, before taking the high road. Of course, nobody was shooting at me with anything but blanks. Could it be that you’re jealous??? :P)
in reply to: smithhammer #43012in reply to: Cock feather? #42724It’s back to bootcamp for you, Col!:P
in reply to: smithhammer #42720Huh? Please interpret???
-
AuthorPosts