Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Backcountry Hunters CO rendezvous #14028
Just booked my tickets. See you at the bash:D
in reply to: Clay Hayes new book! #12856Hello all, the paperbacks are now available on amazon. Go to amazon and do the following: 1)select books in the drop down menu to the left of the search box. 2) search for traditional archery. 3) scoll down until you see the paperback version.
If you get it that way, it’ll help push it to the top in the searches. Thanks a bunch, ch
ps, thanks everyone for the great reviews.
in reply to: Reply To: Enjoy your writing, rants and humor #64029When I get a new TBM two things come first. Any editor’s comments by Don, then it’s straight to the back for campfire philosopher by one of the Daves. I’ve been missing that as well.
in reply to: Clay Hayes new book! #57322I’m staying out of this debate.. But, the paperbacks will be print on demand like Bruce described. There’s no minimum order, no investment really. Just format, upload and that’s it. They’ll hopefully be available by next week sometime.
in reply to: Clay Hayes new book! #56382Thanks Dave, there will be paperbacks available within the next few weeks. I just haven’t got the book formatted for that yet. I’ll let you know.
in reply to: Bow backing #56373maybe this will help a little..
in reply to: installing fur silencers (quick & easy) #48578I’ve never used wool silencers but I’d bet they would handle wet weather better than fur strips. Fur tends to get waterlogged, even otter or beaver. It’s not usually a problem. A pluck of the sting fluffs them out. Fur strips just look cool.
in reply to: Arrow length as substitute for more FOC #40467Back when I was really primitive, I’d use river cane arrows that were, sometimes, up to a foot longer than my draw length. Even with very lightweight bone tips (for small game), these arrows had good flight.
I think longer arrows are, in general, more accurate. But, increasing the shaft length wouldn’t gain you any of the penetration bennifits of EFOC.
in reply to: Bow tiller #30839Steve Graf wrote: Besides, now I can lean way over backwards and shoot the bow upside down. Which really is the most important consideration, in the long run.
😆
I shoot 3 under because it gets the arrow close under my eye which causes my point on to be about 30 yards. I’ve never noticed additional torque.
With modern glass bows, I don’t think tiller would matter much, but I shoot selfbows so I don’t have a lot of experience there.
Smithhammer wrote:
“If you presume to love something, you must love the process of it much more than you love the finished product.”
– John Irving
I think that pretty much sums it up. Actually, that’s pretty much what my film is all about.
I’d offer some deep thoughts, but I’m half way through my 2nd G&T and I’m affraid I’d embarass myself.
ch
in reply to: You might be a traditional bowhunter if … #26514Youz guyz is funny. I’m gonna put some of these on a t shirt!
You might be a traditional bowhunter if
you get nocked up every day:shock: and you like it!
I have no experience with those things. They look like they’d work just fine, but I couldn’t bring myself to drag one around. One of the great things about shooting a trad bow is the freedom it gives you. That’s why I gave away my climbing stand so long ago. A little brush and some shade is all you really need.:wink:
in reply to: What type of arrow? #16452Hello Johnny, good to see you here. As Bruce says, there’s a lot to your question, so don’t think you need to get it all sorted out to start with. I’d like to clarify what the guys are talking about in regards to FOC and deflection.
Deflection is static spine, or how stiff the arrow is.
FOC is Front of Center, or how far forward the ballance point is on your arrow. Most folks around here want that pretty high, and high FOC is easier to get with carbons. I shoot wood arrows because I’m a stubborn a$$ and like the way they smell when they brake:wink:
in reply to: Why the increase in hunters? Study results #58226Yes, I remember you citing some of their work in Heartsblood. Good stuff back then, good stuff now. The motivation of hunters fascinates me and I agree that most folks don’t really know themselves, or really why they hunt. Heck, I’m convinced that most people rarely think of anything deeper than how they’ll pay the cable bill. Nevertheless, surveys like this are still informative. They’re also necessarily limiting. Why we hunt is as individual as, well, the individual. But, you can’t draw statistical conclusions based on everything under the sun, so you have to narrow the variables. I hate being lumped based on standardized answers, especially when asked about something like why I hunt. But I understand why it’s necessary.
As to the hunting media, maybe their failure to take notice of the shifting cultural values is why their ratings are headed south (or so I hear). Also, notice the uptick in media featuring hunters and food. Georgia Pellegrini, Steven Renella (great writer and show btw, even if he does hunt with a rifle), etc. The culture is shifting; outdoor media will follow…Eventually.
in reply to: Backcountry College #6 – "keeping warm" #58209That’s one thing I wish I’d mentioned. If I’m going to be in the wind, I’ll have some sort of wind break outer shell. In my experience, wool isn’t the best for that, but it’s still great under a wind stop shell.
-
AuthorPosts