Home › Forums › Bows and Equipment › Side cut vs center cut bow shelves
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
I’ve been having some discussions with my archery pals and the subject of side cut vs center cut on the shelves has some up several times. I did a search on the site but came up with nothing. Do any of you have any comments on the dynamics or physics of arrow flight between side cut and center cut shelves? Some believe that with a side cut you need to place your mark on a right handed bow to the right whereas on a center cut shelf just point, pick your spot and shoot. Does the archers paradox play into to it at all with respect to side cut vs center cut? I thought some of you physics gurues may be able to shed some light on this subfect for us. Thanks ladies and gents.
Dan
-
I’ll take a swing at your second question first… When the bow and arrow are tuned to each other, it doesn’t matter what the shelf depth is. In fact, many primitive bows do not have shelves at all, and the archer simply shoots off his/her knuckle. As you alluded to, the archers paradox allows the arrow to fly around the bow and head in a straight line to the target.
When a bow/arrow is tuned correctly, they all shoot the same. Simply look down the arrow and loose.
Now to your first question- Bows that have a deeper shelf are said to be easier to tune. Meaning a wider range of arrow spine will fly well out of them. Usually stiffer arrows work better with deeper shelfs. Narrow shelfs generally benefit from weaker spined arrows. And you can adjust the depth of the arrow shelf by adding material to your side plate to push the arrow out if the arrow’s spine is weak…
-
Steve,
That’s simple enough.
Troy
-
Drink one for me!
-
Steve hit the nail square on the head. There’s one part of his response that bears repeating.
“Now to your first question- Bows that have a deeper shelf are said to be easier to tune. Meaning a wider range of arrow spine will fly well out of them.”
That explains why (until you get to very near dead center) the closer to centershot your bow, the more forgiving it shoots. Being less sensitive to spine means it’s less sensitive to inconsistencies in shooting factors that affect dynamic spine—draw length, release, bow torque and such. One of the main reasons for tuning our bows (in addition to eliminating broadhead wind planing and increasing penetration due to straight flight) is to make them more forgiving to shoot.
This is why I rarely, if ever, suggest people build out their strike plates to tune a weak arrow. To me, it seems counterintuitive to tune a bow in an attempt to increase forgiveness by making a change that will reduce that forgiveness—one step forward, one step back. As a side note, the Easton Tuning Guide lists several ways to correct for weak arrow spine, none of which include building out the strike plate (decreasing centershot).
-
On the other hand there several reasons to buildout the sight plate.
1.) The arrows you have are shooting weak. Now you have choice, buy new arrows, decrease point weight, or build out the sight plate. New arrows aren’t cheep, new broadhead aren’t cheep either, cost to build out sight plate, pennies….
2.) The heavest spine you can get isn’t stiff enough. Buying a new bow in lower weight or one with less cut in the sight window is costly as well. Besides, who wants to shoot 45# if you like 60#?
Troy
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.