Home › Forums › Bows and Equipment › Nhambiquara gear
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
Fellas, I’m reading a book about Teddy Roosevelt’s expedition to map the River of Doubt in Brazil, circa 1914. One of the chaps on the expedition brought along an early Kodak camera and took this photo of a Nhambiquara indian shooting his bow and arrow…
A Brazilian Colonel who accompanied TR on the expedition had been shoot at by them when he first met them some 6 years earlier and had one of the arrows lodged in a thick leather bandolier on his chest! He described the arrow as 5 feet long with a 10 inch macaw feather, split in two to create to a 2×10″ fletch and a serrated, curare-coated tip.
No info about the bows, but what a wild arrow design eh?
I also like their hunting outfits 😉
-
Jim,
Those arrows could be used as spears!
By the way, I have that same hunting outfit.8)
-
Great Picture! Thanks.
TR sure did have some adventures. I have a book about him that’s on my list, but it’s so damn thick! I’m sure once I get into it, it’ll go fast.
And that bow, wow what a nice curve!
-
Doc Nock wrote: I believe that outfit is of the scheme “Natura-Hide”…a precursor to a Cabella’s pattern of today…
Seriously though (or as serious as I can be) – “The River of Doubt” is a really good read, about an impressive expedition, during a time when that word still truly meant something.
And I always find it fascinating to look at archival photos of both archery equipment and shooting form/technique across different cultures. It casts a lot of perspective on those modern day “experts” who say that one must shoot their bow with such-and-such form, that an arrow has to be set up such and such way, etc. And often, when you look around, there are numerous examples from other cultures of archers who did things quite differently, and obviously with success. What did all of these other people, who depended on their bows for survival for millenia, do without this modern expert advice?
8)
-
SH,
You must have a rather large HAMMER cause you often hit the Nail on the head, (IMNSHO).
I don’t trust memory much anymore, but in something I read of Doc Ashby, he documented some native culture that after WWII had metal from downed this and that to make broad heads….they were up to 1000 gr. if memory serves…and they had 4′ or so arrows…
What stuck with me most, was Doc sharing that if you looked at their “quiver” it looked a mess as they had arrows of every conceivable length in there… but EACH arrow was hand-tuned to that shooter’s bow and style!
Imagine THAT! Years later, I run across Troy B’s tuning guide on Tuff Head site and bam…tune each arrow! Doh! 😯
As you say, SH, those people LIVES depended on things that worked or they starved… I’m a long way from that from the image in the mirror (and I don’t look wearing that brand of Natura-hide), I’m a long way from starvation, but…I do like to be assured that I have as much “forgiveness” built into my set up as possible…
-
Damn, somebody knew how to tiller a bow, huh?
My theory (unsupported by any empirical evidence or even much hard thinking) is that the long arrow shafts compensated for the lack of fletchings. This guy had a similar notion, expressed far more confidently and elegantly than I’m capable of doing on the subject: Arrow Length and Arrow Flight
-
Doc, I blend in well if your looking into the sun.:) Maybe we need a good eraser here? 😉
It would be interesting to see the paradox of one of those long arrows in flight. They might be so close to the intended that there’s not much time for paradox to get started??????????
Thoughts?
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.